THE DEATH OF
FOREVER
Darryl Reanney
1991
Page103
"...No single feature of
life's environment has impressed itself more strongly on the
basic character of biological systems than this repetitive
process, which has synchronised outer and inner time.
Indeed, as I indicated in the previous chapter, our very
sense of time is, I believe, a part-product of this profound
imprinting.
Environmental cycles
of day and month and year have become internaliscd in the
workings of the human brain. The environmental clocks have
become neural clocks. It is hardly surprising, then, that
primitive man, in his quest to find order in the world
around him, has reversed this process, externalising these
cycles, basing his religions on the rhythms of the earth
because they resonated so comfortingly with the rhythmns of
his mind.
At the risk of
overkill, let me repeat that the human experience was, (and
is), dark (night) is always followed by light (day). Long
periods of darkness (winter months) are always followed by
long periods of light (summer months). The very chemical and
electrical patterns of our brains reflect and reinforce this
oscillatory character of nature. Hence, inevitably, death
has become identified with sleep, to be followed (as our
most basic experience 'proves'), by
awakening.
I could cite
thousands of examples from the traditions of many cultures,
but a few familiar quotes show how profoundly this link
between death and sleep influences us:
I gaze on him and
say: he is not
dead
but
sleeps;
and soon he will arise and
take
me by the hand, I
know he will
awake
and smile on me as
he did
yesterday
Jerome
Bell
To sleep,
perchance to dream, aye there's the
rub
for in
that sleep
of death
what dreams may
come
when we have
shuffled off this mortal
coil
William Shakespeare
in Hamlet
resurrection to come
is the first fruits of those
who have fallen
asleep
I Corinthians
15:20
Are these ideas mere
speculation or can they, in any meaningful way, be tested? I
believe a test is possible. If the deep structure of
/ Page104 /
these religious beliefs
reflects innate patterns which are universally encoded in
the human brain, then, according to my thesis, myths
embodying these basic motifs should have appeared
independently over and over again during the course of human
evolution, in cultures that developed in isolation. (
Isolated, independent develop- ment means that a myth
originating in one culture is unlikely to cross-contaminate
others).
The death and
resurrection motif is a case in point. Myths built around
the idea of rebirth permeate religious traditions in
cultures as far apart in space and time as the Aborigines of
Australia, the Hindus of India, the peoples of ancient Egypt
and the Jews of Palestine. From a global perspective,
perhaps the two most 'successful' rebirth myths are those of
Osiris in Egypt and Jesus in
Israel.
Osiris was the son of
Nut, the sky God, and Geb, the earth God. He married his
sister Isis and reigned over earth in a Paradisic time of
peace and justice. Osiris was killed by his jealous brother
Set. He was eventually found by Isis but Set rediscovered
the body, dismembered it, and scattered it throughout Egypt.
Isis successfully reassembled the fragments, with the
exception of the penis. At this point, the sun God Re sent
Anubis, the jackal-headed God, to supervise the putting
together of Osiris' body, which was wrapped in its own skin.
Hence images of Osiris show him clothed in a shroud which
covers his legs and his hands crossed on his chest. Isis and
another sister, Nephthys, brought Osiris back to life by
waving their arms to fan life back into the 'mummy'. Thus
Osiris was born again, but as Lord of the Dead.
When an ancient
Egyptian died, he or she became Osiris. When members of
Howard Carter's famous expedition broke into the tomb of
Tutankhamun, they found gold plaques, carrying speeches of
welcome from the Gods to the young King as he entered the
Underworld. These clearly show the identification of the
dead King with the God of the Dead. Thus Nut, the Divine
Mother, says:
thy members are
firm, thou smellest the air and goest out as a God, going
out as Atum,
O Osiris
Tutankhamun.
In the living
Egyptian religion, people saw the resurrection of Osiris as
a pledge that they would live forever, provided their
survivors did for them what the Gods had done for the body
of Osiris. Thus the ceremonies performed over the dead human
body were exact copies of those performed by Anubis and
other Gods over the dead body of Osiris.
/
Page 105 /
The intimate relationship
between the basic day / night brain cycle and the saga of
death and rebirth in ancient Egypt is powerfully shown in
the 'union' of Osiris, Lord of the Dead, with Re, the sun
God. One can see the link clearly in the reconstructed
burial ritual of Tutankhamun. After the young King's body
had been mummified and encased in its golden shell, ceremony
focused on resurrection-the rebirth of the dead
God.
Rather than recount
this ceremony, which was exceedingly complex, I will quote
passages from the elegant description by Egyptologist
Christiane Desroches-Noblecourt which clearly show how
deeply the day/night cycle shaped the Egyptian concept of
rebirth after death. Thus:
at the end of his
arduous search for survival, the dead Osiris
would appear
in the
aspect of the rising
sun,
Re
the graves of the
masters of Thebes repeated the dramatic
story
of the sun's gestation and its
rebirth at
the fifth
hour
emulating the
sun, the
king was to draw from the world of the
dead renewed
strength
for his
morning rebirth
there remained the
last act of the drama:
rebirth.
The room the
excavators called
the annex was entirely dedicated to this, and
its door,
which faces
East,
suggests that it was deliberately
orientated in this
direction to favour the pharaoh's
rising
after his
transformations Osiris the King was to spring from the
horizon as
Re,
star of
day
What could be
clearer?
Experts on religion
may object that the Pharaohs were 'God-Kings' hence the mode
of their burial is not representative of the common faith of
ancient Egypt. This may be true as regards the grandeur of
the burial ceremonies, but the indestructible link between
Egyptian belief in an afterlife and the image of the sun
goes back to the roots of Egyptian life. Listen to this hymn
to the sun God Re by an unknown Egyptian simply code-named
N:
O all you gods of
the Soul-mansion who judge sky and earth in the balance, who
give food and provisions; 0 Tatenen, Unique One, creator of
mankind; 0 Southern, Northern, Western and Eastern Enneads,
give praise to Re, Lord of the Sky, the Sover-
/ Page 106 /
eign who made the
Gods. Worship him in his goodly shape when he appears in the
Day-bark.
Echoes of this
ancient belief persist into the modern age. During the First
World War, soldiers spoke of their dead cornrades as having
'gone West', i.e. followed the setting sun. Similarly, some
of our most popular hymns retain day/night
symbolism:
and with the dawn
those angel faces
smile
that I have loved
long since and lost
awhile
Cardinal Newman (Lead
Kindly Light)
Is this, one wonders,
one reason why they are so well-beloved? The antiquity of
the idea of rebirth and its deep association with the day /
night cycle is shown in the idea of reincarnation. Whereas
the religions of the Middle East show rebirth as a once-only
affair, the older faiths of India show it in its repetitive
form, which corresponds more closely with the underlying
biological reality. In Indian tradition, the soul is
repeatedly reborn: each death is followed by new life, just
as each night is followed by new day, each winter by new
spring.
Thus in the Gita of
the Ayran Indians, the lord Shri Krishna says:
At the dawning of
that day all objects in manifestation
stream
forth from the
Unmanifest , and, when
evening
falls, they
are
dissolved into It
again
The same multitude
of beings, which have lived on earth so
often,
all are dissolved
as the
night
of the universe approaches, to
issue
forth anew when
morning
breaks. Thus it is ordained.
"
The Alizzed
transcribes the
Magikalalphabet
SHRI KRISHNA
|
S
|
H
|
R
|
I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
R
|
I
|
S
|
H
|
N
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
+
|
=
|
36
|
3+6
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
19
|
8
|
14
|
|
|
+
|
=
|
50
|
5+0
|
=
|
5
|
|
|
S
|
H
|
R
|
I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
R
|
I
|
S
|
H
|
N
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
8
|
18
|
9
|
|
+
|
=
|
54
|
5+4
|
=
|
9
|
NINE
|
|
11
|
18
|
9
|
19
|
8
|
14
|
1
|
|
+
|
=
|
80
|
8+0
|
=
|
8
|
EIGHT
|
|
1+0
|
|
1+8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
8
|
9
|
9
|
|
+
|
=
|
27
|
2+7
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
O
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
U
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
15
|
4
|
|
+
|
=
|
26
|
2+6
|
=
|
8
|
|
|
19
|
21
|
14
|
|
+
|
=
|
54
|
5+4
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
G
|
O
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
U
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
6
|
4
|
|
+
|
=
|
17
|
1+7
|
=
|
8
|
EIGHT
|
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
|
+
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
NINE
|
|
G
|
O
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
U
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
4
|
|
+
|
=
|
11
|
1+1
|
=
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
O
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
U
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
15
|
4
|
|
+
|
=
|
26
|
2+6
|
=
|
8
|
|
|
19
|
21
|
14
|
|
+
|
=
|
54
|
5+4
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
1+5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+9
|
2+1
|
1+4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
1+0
|
3
|
5
|
|
+
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
6
|
4
|
|
+
|
=
|
17
|
1+7
|
=
|
8
|
EIGHT
|
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
|
+
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
NINE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O
|
S
|
NINE
|
R
|
NINE
|
S
|
|
+
|
=
|
EIGHT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THAT
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
|
+
|
=
|
18
|
1+8
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
NINE
|
|
|
O
|
S
|
I
|
R
|
I
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
19
|
9
|
18
|
9
|
19
|
|
+
|
=
|
89
|
8+9
|
=
|
17
|
1+ 7
|
=
|
8
|
TIMES
|
|
|
1+5
|
1+9
|
|
1+8
|
|
1+9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
10
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
+
|
=
|
35
|
3+5
|
=
|
8
|
|
|
|
THAT
|
|
|
|
1+0
|
|
|
|
1+0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EIGHT
|
|
|
6
|
1
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
1
|
|
+
|
=
|
35
|
3+5
|
=
|
8
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
K
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEDUCE
|
|
|
11
|
1
|
|
+
|
=
|
3
|
|
|
|
THAT
|
|
|
1+1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
+
|
=
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
THREE
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K
|
A'
|
S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
1
|
19
|
+
|
=
|
31
|
3+1
|
=
|
4
|
FOUR
|
4
|
Now do you
understand, almost whispered Zed Aliz Zed
gently
THE DEATH OF
FOREVER
Darryl Reaney
1991
Page 106
"Perhaps the most telling
trace of the age-old association between God and the sun
survives in language. Our word divine stems from the Latin
word for 'God' deus. But this in turn evolved from the Latin
word dies, meaning day (daylight). English and Latin are
both branches of the Indo-European root language in which
dei meant to shine or be luminous. Thus the symbolism of sun
worship has remained encoded in speech long after men have
ceased to deify the sun in practice (of course the word
'deify' comes from the same, ancient source). Likewise, the
holy day of the Christian week is still referred to as
sunday. The head of Jesus on church frescoes and stained
glass windows is often shown surrounded by a luminous
'halo', showing how a symbol of the sun has become
identified with
/ Page107 /
the central figure of
Christian belief. And the date of Christmas, December 25,
coincides closely with the winter solstice in the Northern
hemisphere.
Itis small wonder
that the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung described rebirth as
'an affirmation that must be counted on among the primordial
affirmations of mankind'.
Page 101 /
The latin prefix 're'
usually has the sense
/ Page 102 /
of 'again'. Can it be
coincidence that the words we use to describe our
fundamental myths and activities are not things we do but
things we do
again?
reproduction
redemption
representation
reincarnation
recognition
rebirth
resurrection
Even the word
re-ligion may fit this pattern: one of its possible meanings
is 'bind (join) again'. In the Christian tradition, we are
told that Christ 'rose again from the dead', despite the
fact that the resurrection of his body was supposedly an
unique, once-off
affair.
Taken together, these
facts tell us something quite fundamen- tal-that there is a
natural and inevitable association between the concept of an
afterlife and the enduring legacy of cyclic time. Far from
being an innovation or an invention, the religious idea of
rebirth, of life (light) after death (dark), is an
expression of one of the oldest aspects of life on earth.
Most 'higher' creatures exhibit daily circadian rhythmns
(from Latin circa meaning about, die meaning day). It is
possible to isolate mutants of the common fruit fly in which
the clock governing these innate cycles no longer runs in
twenty-four hour intervals. The gene governing this clock
has now been identified and shown to be virtually the same
in chickens, mice and humans. As the definitive text The
Molecular Biology of the Gene notes
significantly:
the inescapable
conclusion is that we human beings. proud possessors of
sophisticated intelligence. willfind that our behav- iour is
governed to some extent by elementary biochemical
reactions.
Thus resurrection and
reincarnation have been successful in gaining adherents
because they correspond deeply with the way our brains work.
In an important sense, the rebirth of the self is a memory
not a prediction-by the time we die, our mind clocks will
have recorded, on average, about 27 000 successive
'rebirths'. This kind of calculation becomes more compelling
if we extend it to cover not just the course of a human life
but the course of life on earth. The mind clock carries a
memory of approximately 1400 000 000 day/night cycles-the
number of times the earth has turned on its
/ Page 103 /
axis since life began. No
single feature of life's environment has impressed itself
more strongly on the basic character of biological systems
than this repetitive process, which has synchronised outer
and inner time. Indeed, as I indicated in the previous
chapter, our very sense of time is, I believe, a
part-product of this profound
imprinting.
Environmental cycles
of day and month and year have become internaliscd in the
workings of the human brain. The environmental clocks have
become neural clocks. It is hardly surprising, then, that
primitive man, in his quest to find order in the world
around him, has reversed this process, externalising these
cycles, basing his religions on the rhythms of the earth
because they resonated so comfortingly with the rhythmns of
his mind.
At the risk of
overkill, let me repeat that the human experience was, (and
is), dark (night) is always followed by light (day). Long
periods of darkness (winter months) are always followed by
long periods of light (summer months). The very chemical and
electrical patterns of our brains reflect and reinforce this
oscillatory character of nature. Hence, inevitably, death
has become identified with sleep, to be followed (as our
most basic experience 'proves'), by
awakening.
I could cite
thousands of examples from the traditions of many cultures,
but a few familiar quotes show how profoundly this link
between death and sleep influences us:"
The
scribe counts the
numbers
LIGHT . . .
DARK
JOSEPH AND HIS BROTHERS
Thomas Mann
1933
Page 914 /
"At On, Amenhotep entered
his palace in the temple district and slept there
dreamlessly the first night, exhausted from the journey. The
following day he began by sacrificing to Re Horakhte with
bread and beer, wine, birds, and incense. After that he
listened to the Vizier of the North, who spoke before him at
length, and then, regardless of the headache that had
brought on, devoted the rest of the day to the much-desired
talks with the priests of the God. These conferences, which
at the moment greatly occupied Amenhotep's mind, had been
taken up with the subject of the bird Bennu, also
/ Page 915 /
9 x 1 x 5 = 45 4 + 5 = 9
/
called Offspring of Fire,
because it was said that he was motherless, and moreover his
own father, since dying and beginning were the same for him.
For he burned himself up in his nest made of myrrh and came
forth from the ashes again as young Bennu. This happened,
some authorities said, every five hundred years; happened in
fact in the temple of the sun at On, whither the bird, a
heron-like eagle, purple and gold, came for the purpose from
Arabia or even India. Other authorities asserted that it
brought with it an egg made of myrrh as big as it could
carry, wherein it had put its deceased father, that is to
say actually itself, and laid it down on the sun-alter.
These two assertions might subsist side by side - after all,
there sub-sists so much side by side, differing things may
both be true and only different expressions of the same
truth. But what Pharaoh first wanted to know, what he wanted
to discuss, was how much time had passed out of the five
hundred years which lay between the bird and the egg; how
far they were on the one hand from the last appearance and
on the other from the next one; in short, at what point of
the phoenix-year they stood. The majority opinion of the
priests was that it must be somewhere about the middle of
the period. They reasoned that if it was still near its
beginning, then some memory of the last appear-ance of Bennu
must still exist and that was not the case. But suppose they
were near the end of one period and the beginning of the
next; then they must reckon on the impending or immediate
return of the time-bird. But none of them counted on having
the experience in his lifetime so the only remaining
possibility was that they were about the middle of the
period. Some of the shiny pates went so far as to suspect
that they would always remain in the middle, the mystery of
the Bennu bird being precisely this: that the distance
between the last appearance of the Phoenix and his next one
was always the same, always a middle point. But the mystery
was not in itself the important thing to Pharaoh. The
burning question to be discussed, which was the object of
his visit, and which then he did discuss for a whole
half-day with the shiny-pates, was the doctrine that the
fire-bird's myrrh egg in which he had shut up the body of
his father did not thereby become heavier. For he had made
it anyhow as large and heavy as he could possibly carry, and
if he was still able to carry it after he had put his
father's body in it, then it must follow that the egg had
not thereby increased in
weight.
That was an exiting
and enchanting fact of world-wide impor-tance. In young
Pharaoh's eyes it was worthy of the most circum-stantial
exposition. If one added to a body another body and it did
not become heavier thereby, that must mean there were
immaterial bodies - or differently and better put,
incorporeal realities, immaterial as sunlight; or, again
differently and still better put, there was the spir-itual;
and this spiritual was etherally embodied in the
Bennu-father,
Page 916
9 x 1 x 6 = 54 5 + 4 = 9
/
whom the myrrh egg
received while altering its character thereby in the most
exciting and significant way. For the egg was altogether a
definitely female kind of thing; only the female among birds
laid eggs and nothing could be more mother-female than the
great egg out of which once the world came forth. But Bennu
the sun-bird, motherless and his own father, made his own
egg himself, an egg against the natural order, a masculine
egg, a father-egg, and laid it as a manifestation of
fatherhood, spirit, and light upon the alabaster table of
the sun-divinity.
Pharaoh could not
talk enough with the sun calendar men of the temple of Re
about this event and its significance for the developing
nature of Aton. He discussed deep into the night, he
discussed to excess, he wallowed in golden immateriality and
father spirit, and when the priests were worn out and their
shiny pates nodded, he was still not tired and could not
summon resolution to dismiss them - almost as though he were
afraid to stay alone. But at last he did dismiss them,
nodding and stumbling to their rest, and himself sought his
bedchamber. His dressing and undressing slave was an elderly
man assigned to him as a boy, who called him Meni although
not otherwise informal or lacking in respect. He had been
awaiting his master for hours by the light of the hanging
lamp and now quickly made him ready for the night. Then he
flung himself on his face and withdrew to sleep on the
threshold. Pharaoh for his part nestled into the cushions of
his exquisitely ornate bed, which stood on a dais in the
middle of the room, its headboard decorated with the finest
ivory-work displaying figures of jackals, goats, and Bes. He
fell almost at once into an exhausted sleep. But only for a
short time. After a few hours of profound oblivion he began
to dream: such com-plicated, impressive, absurd, and vivid
dreaming as he had not done since he was a child with
tonsillitis."
|