|
Page 181
Joseph the
Vizier
Eighty miles (c. I 29km) south of modem Cairo is the town of
Medinet- el-Faiyilin, where a 200-mile (322km) canal from
the Nile has long transformed the desert waste into a lush
garden paradise of fruit groves. To the local residents (the
fellahin) and throughout Egypt, the ancient waterway is
known as Bahr Yusuf (Joseph's Canal), and it is said to be
named after Joseph the grand vizier.37
/ Page 182 /
(diagram Map omitted)
Genesis (41:39-43) tells
how this Joseph was made Governor of Egypt:
And Pharaoh said unto Joseph. . . . Thou shalt be over my
house and according unto thy word shall all my people be
ruled: only in the throne will I be greater than thou. . .
and he made him ruler over all the land of Egypt;
A later Genesis entry, which is rarely quoted, has Joseph
saying, 'God hath made me a father to Pharaoh' (Genesis
45:8). This is a particularly impressive statement and could
not possibly have related to Joseph, son of Jacob, who was
sold into slavery. But was there perhaps a grand vizier who
fathered a pharaoh - a prestigious governor after whom a
canal
/ Page183 /
might have been named and
who would have ridden in the king's second chariot, as
related in Genesis (4l:43)? Indeed there was: a vizier who,
contrary to normal custom, was embalmed like a pharaoh
(precisely as described in the last verse of Genesis) and
entombed in a fine sarcophagus in no less a place than the
royal burial ground - the Valley of Kings at western Thebes
(modem Luxor)."
The scribe writ of Thebes, the best
Egyptian tomb inscriptions usually relate, in one way or
another, to the godhead under which the occupant was placed
in life, using such deiform names as Ra, Amen and Ptah. In
this case, the unusual tomb inscriptions of the grand vizier
do not relate to any known god of Egypt; they reveal instead
such names as Ya-ya and Yu-ya - phonetically, Iouiya, which
is akin to Yaouai, a variant of Yahweh or Jehovah.38 From
these inscriptions, the vizier has become personally known
as Yuya, and this is of particular interest because his
grandson, Pharaoh Akhenaten, later developed the 'One God'
concept in Egypt.
Yuya (Yusut) was the principal minister for the
eighteenth-dynasty Pharaoh Tut~osis IV (c.14l3-l405 BC) and
for his son Amenhotep III (c.1405-l367 BC).39 His tomb was
discovered in 1905, along with that of his wife Tuya (the
Asenath), and the mummies ofYuya and Tuya are among the very
best preserved in the Cairo Museum.40 It came as a great
surprise to Egyptologists that anyone outside the immediate
royal family should have been mummified and buried in the
Valley of Kings. Clearly, this couple were of tremendous
importance in their day; this becomes obvious from Yuya's
funerary papyrus, which refers to him as 'The Holy Father of
the Lord of the Two Lands' (it ntr n nb tawi), as does his
royal funerary statuette.41 The style 'Lord of the Two
Lands' was a pharaonic title relating to the kingdoms of
Upper and Lower Egypt,42 and so it is plain that Yuya was
not only the viceroy and primary state official, but was
also the father of a pharaoh, just as related in Genesis
(45:8). He even held some personal kingly status, as
determined by his pharaonic designation, 'One trusted by the
good god in the entire land'.43
Yuya's family was very influential, holding inherited land
in the Egyptian delta, and he was a powerful military
leader.44 Anen, the elder son of Yuya and Tuya, also rose to
high office under Amenhotep III as Chancellor of Lower
Egypt, High Priest of Heliopolis and Divine Father of the
nation. But it was their younger son, Aye, who held the
special distinction 'Father of the God'45 and became pharaoh
in 1352 BC - as did other descendants of Yusuf- Yuya,
including the now famous Tutankhamun (see Chart: The
Egyptian Connection, pp.256-57).
Not only was Yuya of individual royal significance, but so
too was his
/ Page 184 /
wife Tuya. Genesis
(41:45) tells us that Tuya (Touiou) held the dis- tinction
of 'Asenath' (iw s-n-t) - a style which derives from an
eighteenth-dynasty Egyptian dialect and means 'She belongs
to the goddess Neith'.46 Tuya was the daughter of a priest
of Heliopolis and, according to the Corpus of Hieroglyphic
Inscriptions at the Brooklyn Museum, she was the designated
'King's Ornament' (kheret nesw). By way of her mother, she
is reckoned to have perhaps been a grand- daughter
ofTuthmosis III,47 founder of the Great White Brotherhood of
the Therapeutate, while through her father she was descended
from Igrath (daughter of Esau and Mahalath), the mother of
Queen Sobeknefru who established the Dragon Court as a royal
institution in Egypt.
We are, therefore, into the realm of the original covenant
of kingship made with Isaac. His son Esau may have sold his
birthright to his younger twin brother Jacob-Israel (whose
descendants became kings of Judah), but now we discover
that, through Tuya and Yuya, descendants of Esau did indeed
become pharaohs of Egypt. These particular pharaohs have
become known as the' Amarna Kings' : they were Akhenaten,
Smenkhkare, Tutankhamun and Aye, who ruled consecu- tively
c.1367-1348 BC.
From the eighteenth-dynasty campaigns of Akhenaten's
great-great- grandfather, Tuthmosis III (c.1490-1436 BC),
Palestine was under Egyptian rule and it remained so into
the era of the Amarna Kings. The American Egyptologist James
Henry Breasted referred to Tuthmosis III as the 'Napoleon of
Egypt',48 and the empire (from Syria to Western Asia)
established by him and his son Amenhotep II was certainly
in- dicative of the kingly domain promised to the
descendants of Isaac: 'from the river of Egypt, unto the
river Euphrates' (Genesis 15:18). If the covenant were to be
taken literally, it would appear that the selling of the
birthright by Esau to Jacob had no effect whatever; it was
not until after the Amarna period that the lines from Esau
and Jacob were united through marriage, subsequently
descending to the Davidic kings of Judah.
GENESIS
OF THE GRAIL
KINGS
Laurence Gardner 1998
Page 46
" The Old Testament's
best-known giant is, of course, Goliath of Gath, the
Philistine warrior who challenged the shepherd-boy David. We
are told that Goliath's height was 'six cubits and a span'
(1 Samuel 17:4)- that is
six
forearms (of 20 inches/50cm) and a spread hand (of
9
inches/22.5cm).
So Goliath was
10
feet
9
inches (3.27m) tall. By any standard of reckoning, this is
immense. Even allowing for a 25 per cent exaggeration in
order to enhance David's predicament, we are still left with
an 8-foot man. However, there are such warriors in our
modern age: the post-war German wrestler Kurt Zehe, for
example, was 8 feet 4 inches tall, while the Rotterdam
colossus of the ring, Rhinehardt, stood at 9 feet 6
inches.12 Many of today's American basketball players might
be regarded as giants, but they are plainly not hideous
ogres in accordance with the image conjured by the word
'giant' in mythology and romantic literature.
In spite of Goliath's physique, and the enormity of his
sword, young David slew him, prior to any legitimate combat,
with a well-aimed sling-shot to the forehead. But in later
times, when threatened by Goliath's equally large family
members, 'David waxed faint', leaving their destruction to
his servants (2 Samuel 21:15-22). Elhanan of Bethlehem
managed to slay the brother of Goliath, 'whose spear-staff
was like a weaver's beam'. David's nephew Jonathan then slew
a son of Goliath who had' on every hand
six
fingers, and on every foot
six
toes'. Othe]
sons of Goliath, namely Ishi-benob and Saph, were also
killed by David's men Abishai and Sibbechai, but in no event
are we told how th« victories were won.
Page 174
"Even though
inscriptions from before the time of Manetho were
dis-covered in later times, these were in the form of
ancient hieroglyphs (picture-symbols) and it was not until
1822 that the hieroglyphic code was broken by the French
Egyptologist Jean Francois Champollion. This decipherment
was achieved by way of the now famous Rosetta Stone,2 found
near Alexandria in 1799 by Lieutenant Bouchard of the
Napoleonic expedition into Egypt. The black basalt stone
from about 196 BC carries the same content in three
different scripts: Egyptian
/ Page 175 /
hieroglyphs, Egyptian
demotic (everyday cursive writing) and scribal Greek.
Through comparative analysis of these scripts (with the
Greek language being readily familiar), the hieroglyphic
code was revealed; it was then cross-referenced with
pharaonic cartouches (ornamental oval- shaped inscriptions
denoting royal names)3 of the Egyptian kings.
Once the hieroglyphs were understood, the content of other
ancient records could be decoded. Among them are some which
give kingly lists to compare with the records of Manetho.
They include the Palermo Stone,4 a black diorite slab which
details the last pre-dynastic kings before 3100 BC, followed
by the pharaohs through to the fifth-dynasty Neferirkare in
about 2490 BC.5 Also now translated are the Royal List of
Karnak (Thebes),6 the Royal List of Abydos,7 the Abydos King
List,S the Royal List of Saqqara9 and the Royal Canon of
Turin, a papyrus from about 1200 BC."
The scribe states in all honesty the number of letters in
the following alphabets
Jewish
22
Greek
24
English
26
THAT
22 + 24 + 26
72
7 + 2
IZ
NINE
THE HOLY
BIBLE
Scofield References
St Mark A.D.
33
Chapter 14
Page
1068
|
33
|
"And when the
sixth hour was come, there was a darkness over the
whole land unto the ninth hour
|
|
34
|
And at the ninth
hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, Eloi , Eloi,
lama Sabachthani? Which is being interpreted,
My God My
God why hast thou forsaken
me?
|
Page
608
To the chief
Musician upon Aije-leth Shahar, A Psalm of
David
"MY God my God why
hast thou forsaken me
why art
thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my
roaring ?"
That acounting scribe, noted the nine words.

CASSELL'S ENGLISH
DICTIONARY
1974 Edition
Page 541
Hebraic
(he bra' ik) [late L. Hebraicus, Gr.
Hebraikos], a. Pertaimng to the Hebrews, their mode of
thought, or language.
Hebraically,
adv.
Hebraism
(he' bra izm), n. The thought or religion of the Hebrews; a
Hebrew characteristic; a Hebrew idiom or expression.
Hebraist,
n. One learned in the Hebrew language and literature;
one who conforms or adheres to Jewish ideas or religious
observances.
Hebraistic,
-al (he bra is' tik, -al), a.
Hebraistically,
adv. hebraize, v.t. To convert into a Hebrew
idiom; to give a Hebrew character to. v.i. To
become Hebrew; to act according to Hebrew manners or
fashions.
Hebrew
(he' broo) [F. hebreu, L. Hebraeus, Gr.
Hebraios, Aram. ebrai, Heb. 'ibri,
prob. one from the other side, an immigrant], n.
A Jew, an Israelite; the language of the ancient Jews and of
the State of Israel; (colloq.) unintelligible talk,
gibberish. a. Pertaining to the Jews.
Hebrew-
wise, adv.
In an Opposite sense (from the fact that Hebrew is read from
right to left).
Hebridean
(he brid' e in) [Hebrides, erron. for L.
Hebudes (Pliny), Hebudae., Gr.
Heboudai, a. 0f or pertaining to the Hebrides,
islands off the west coast of Scotland.
Hecate
(hek' a
te) [Gr. Hekate], n. (Gr. Myth.
mysterious goddess holding sway in earth, heaven, and the
under-world, and represented as triforn hag, a witch.
Hecataean
(hek a te'
in), a."
"...hectometre
(hek to me
ter)
n A French
measure of length containing 100 metres or 109.3633
yds."
|
|
H
|
E
|
B
|
R
|
E
|
W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
=
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
5
|
|
|
=
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+8
|
|
2+3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
23
|
|
|
=
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H
|
E
|
B
|
R
|
E
|
W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
5
|
2
|
18
|
5
|
23
|
|
+
|
=
|
61
|
6+1
|
=
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1+8
|
|
2+3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
5
|
2
|
9
|
5
|
5
|
|
+
|
=
|
34
|
3+4
|
=
|
7
|
SEVEN
|
7
|
THE MAGIC
MOUNTAIN
THOMAS
MANN
1875 -1955
FOREWARD
THE STORY of Hans Castorp, which we would here set forth,
not on his own account, for in him the reader will make
acquaintance with a simple-minded though pleasing young man,
but for the sake of the story itself, which seems to us
highly worth telling- though it must needs be borne in mind,
in Hans Castorp's behalf, that it is his story, and not
every story happens to everybody- this story, we say,
belongs to the long ago; is already, so to speak, covered
with historic mould, and unquestionably to be presented in
the tense best suited to a narrative out of the depth of the
past.
That should be no drawback to a story, but rather the
reverse. Since histories must be in the past, then the more
past the better, it would seem, for them in their character
as histories, and for him, the teller of them, rounding
wizard of times gone by. With this story, moreover, it
stands as it does to-day with human beings, not least among
them writers of tales: it is far older than its years; its
age may not be measured by length of days, nor the weight of
time on its head reckoned by the rising or setting of suns.
In a word, the degree of its antiquity has noways to do with
the pas- sage of time - in which statement the author
intentionally touches upon the strange and questionable
double nature of that riddling element.
But we would not wilfully obscure a plain matter. The
exag-gerated pastness of our narrative is due to its taking
place before the epoch when a certain crisis shattered its
way through life and consciousness and left a deep chasm
behind. It takes place - or. rather, deliberately to avoid
the present tense. it took place, and had taken place - in
the long ago, in the old days, the days of the world before
the Great War, in the beginning of which so much began that
has scarcely yet left off beginning. Yes, it took place
before that; yet not so long before. Is not the pastness of
the past the profounder, the completer, the more legendary,
the more Im- meoiately before the present it falls? More
than that, our story has, of its own nature, something of
the legend about it now and again
Page xii We shall tell it at length, thoroughly, in
detail-for when did a narrative seem too long or too short
by reason of the actual time or space it took up? We do not
fear being called meticulous, in-clinng as we do to the view
that only the exhaustive can be truly . interesting.
, Not all in a minute, then, will the narrator be finished
with the story of our Hans. The seven days of a week will
not suffice, no, nor seven months either. Best not too soon
make too plain how much mortal time must pass over his head
while he sits spun round in his spell. Heaven forbid it
should be seven years!
And now we begin.
|